Albert
Bandura is wildly known for his contributions to the health field. He created the Social Learning Theory (SLT)
or what is known today as the Social Cognitive Theory (SCT). The only real difference between the SLT and
SCT is an added construct of self-efficacy, which will be noted in the following
paragraphs. Not only is this theory good
for determining how people obtain and preserve certain behaviors, it also provides
the researcher with intervention strategies.
As a health educator we use this theory on a regular basis to change
behaviors, but it can be applied to any area of expertise as long as there is a
desired behavior involved.
The Social Cognitive Theory is very
simple in that a person’s desired behavior is affected by 3 concepts that are
intertwined. Unfortunately, there are 11
constructs of this theory that many of us confuse very easily. To keep it simple enough to understand, this
overview will touch on the three concepts and give an overview of the constructs.
The theory explains that your personal and environmental factors affect your
behaviors (good or bad). Think of a
triangle with one of those three concepts at each corner with arrows pointing
in each direction. As you move along the
arrows, notice how each one affects the other.
“Behavior is not simply the result of the environment and the person,
just as the environment is not simply the result of the person and behavior”
(Glanz et al, 2002). The fluidness of
this theory is what gives it the backbone to change or maintain a desired
behavior. The 11 constructs within this
theory can be interesting to learn, which enhance the underlying concepts of
the theory. To help you understand the
construct with ease, there has been a brief overview added with each construct
within the current objective of this assignment.
So the objective is to apply the Social
Cognitive Theory to instruction that incorporates Internet-based
applications. The desired behavior the
theory will address is Internet-based instruction, more specifically using
social media. Remember that behavior
affects environment and personal factors, so if the instructor is limited in
any of those three then the behavior will not happen. Behavioral capability is by far the most important
construct because if the person does not understand the objective and have the necessary
skills to perform a behavior then it will go nowhere. If an instructor possesses no knowledge about
social media then it will be expected that no use of it would occur within the
classroom. So the first obstacle is
allowing the instructor to understand the materials taught. When this occurs it then can be directed
towards students within the classroom. Expectations
and Expectancies can be grouped together because the individual must value the
importance (expectancies) of using social media within the classroom and have
strong beliefs (expectations) that it will be effective. The instructor gains this by having the knowledge. Therefore applying social media to the
classroom is more applicable and students value the expected outcome.
Locus of control and Self-Efficacy can
also be lumped together because these two constructs deal with feeling control
and how comfortable doing an action may be.
If the instructor feels comfortable in the material and can confidently
use it, then it can be ascertained that it will be used within the
classroom. Reciprocal Determinism,
Emotional-coping response, and Observational learning can all be lumped into
one because they all deal with the interactions with the behavior change. Observational learning is easy as the old
saying monkey see, monkey do. If the
instructor watches other people using social medias within the classroom and
notice its effectiveness then there is a higher chance the instructor will use
that same method in their own classroom.
Reciprocal determinism is the interaction between the individual and
their environment. If the instructor
doesn’t have the right equipment provided by the school to engage social media
within the classroom, then there is disconnect in the ability to use it within
the classroom. Lastly, the
Emotional-coping response deals with any emotions that may occur by learning
the behavior. An instructor might feel
anxious because it might not work will not learn how to use it properly. They must overcome that fear before they can
learn. The other constructs of this
model are not applicable, but still have a place within the SCT.
For an instructor to use the SCT within
the classroom they can transform their space into a social media center. The instructor can provide activities that
engage learning with social media. An
example could be a classroom Prezi page that students can collaborate with
other students on specific topics that might interest them. The instructor must reinforce any good
behaviors within that classroom to ensure that students are working on
task. An example could be rewarding them
with bonus points or a healthy snack for staying on task the entire class
period. The instructor must also support
students as they understand the materials provided. An example could be as students become
comfortable with understanding and knowing the materials they could be the
teacher and present their topics to the class using the Prezi website. Each student could then follow along with the
presentation.
These are only a few examples on how to
use the SCT within the classroom and since there are numerous constructs within
the theory it seems like the possibilities are endless. As long as there is a
willing teacher to try it, then there is a learning opportunity for
students.
Reference:
K.Glanz, B. Rimer, & F.M. Lewis (2002). Health behavior and health education: Theory, research, and practice 3rd edition. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Hi Derek,
ReplyDeleteIt was interesting to read about Bandura’s social cognitive theory which I have somewhat forgotten. But your summary has brought it back to memory. I found it interesting that you chose to discuss how the theory applies to teacher, as well as student behavior. Indeed the choices we make in life are the results of personal and environmental factors – to what degree of influence each of these have is specific to the individual, the situation, or to the choice we have to make.
When you describe how SCT can be used in the classroom, you gave the example of engaging students in a constructing a Prezi page. I find this idea of student engagement tying in with the theory I have read. The engagement theory discusses how the use of technology in the classroom increases student engagement and their motivation to learn.
From the aspect of SCT, learning happens when all the personal and the environmental factors facilitate the sought-after behavior. This deals with the alignment of the cognitive readiness of the student and the emotionally/physically/technologically, etc. supportive environment to facilitate a particular behavior.
The only part I disagree with is the reinforcement part. Why should students be reinforced for doing what they are supposed to be doing in the classroom? Would it mean that they will only do it in the future because they know they will receive a snack? Can there be other type of feedback (let’s say, verbal) from the teacher or peers that would encourage students to stay on task and actually enjoy learning just for the sake of learning?
Can technology be the tool that offers this intrinsic motivation and self-directed learning that our students could/will engage in?